Open Scholarship: Current Peer Review system is “obsolete”
Posted in Cloud and Social Web on August 24th, 2010 by admin – Be the first to comment
Peer reviewed journals in the humanities are experimenting with Web tools to re-engineer the process of deciding what is and isn’t scholarship. The traditional peer review process developed in a particular technological and social environment as a way to screen new research for quality and draw the borderline between amateurs and specialized experts. Of course it is prone to “[c]lubby exclusiveness, sloppy editing and fraud…”, and it is slow. But up to now it has been the essential gatekeeper and is crucial in how universities make tenure decisions.
Open review has been experimented with for some time already in economics and science.
Money quotes:
“What we’re experiencing now is the most important transformation in our reading and writing tools since the invention of movable type,” said Katherine Rowe, a Renaissance specialist and media historian at Bryn Mawr College. “The way scholarly exchange is moving is radical, and we need to think about what it means for our fields.”…
“Serious scholars are asking whether the institutions of the academy — as they have existed for decades, even centuries — aren’t becoming obsolete”…
“The traditional process is not so much a gold standard but an effective accommodation to the needs of the field. It represents a settlement for a particular moment, not a perfect ideal.”
This would represent a huge change. It’s another example of how Internet technology disrupts every entrenched, privileged group in society.
Even “liberals” in academia are terrified of this one. I have had several heated discussions about this in the past few years. A system that accommodated a particular time, social order, and technological culture has come to be accepted as nature, especially by the people that it privileges. Rethinking it seems like a good idea to me.
What do you think? If you are opposed to Open Review, can you explain why Peer Review is better, given the availability of much more powerful tools for collaboration and discussion?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html
The photo is from an exhibit of early Italian printed books at the John Hay Library at Brown University, Providence, RI.
If you have a blog and use Twitter, you need a way to publish your blog posts to your timeline.
If you are running Chrome and use Gmail (isn’t everybody?), you can now drag any file attachment right onto the Desktop.
Lunch yesterday with Mary Serreze, publisher of 
There are no silver bullets to getting well-known on the internet. At the end of the day, you have to do it the hard way: provide great content, find your community, share, link and grow. Tricks will not get you anywhere that you really want to go, unless your life’s ambition is to be a successful spammer.


